Housing Societies · Multan Market

Verified Housing Society Rankings in Multan

Evaluated strictly by the housing societies scoring engine: legal approval (25%) · development progress (20%) · occupancy (residents) (15%) · historical market performance (10%) · market demand and liquidity (10%) · location (10%) · utilities (5%) · developer track record (5%).

Ranked developments: 1
Verified legal NOCs: 32
Average score: 88.7 / 100
Data confidence: 78 / 100

Photo: Tomb of Shah Rukn-e-Alam, Multan by Rana Abdul Qudoos, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Filtered to: Multan View All Pakistan →

Housing Societies Overview Metrics

Total Researched

Multan records

Qualifying Ranked

≥ 60% Verified

Average Score

88.7

Ranked projects

Data Confidence

Evidence depth score

Verified Legal Files

Statutory NOCs

Under Research

Awaiting ≥ 60%

Leading Verified Investments

Top-ranked developments with verified regulatory compliance, developer execution, and market evidence.

★ Rank #1 Leader

88.7 /100

Shah Rukne Alam Phase-I

Multan

Verified Approved Low risk

Confidence: 78 (High)
Evidence Depth: 85% of weight

Verified Nov 2026 View Project Analysis →

Score Comparison & Factor Weights

Comparative visualization of investment scores and approved methodology weighting.

Top Ranked Projects: Score vs. Confidence

Comparison of empirical investment score and data confidence depth

Verified Data

Scoring Factor Weights

Approved category weights under Methodology v1

Verified Data

Filter Leaderboard & Directory

Legal status

Index status

Development

Confidence

Risk

City

Reset

Verified Housing Societies Leaderboard

1 ranked · 0 not eligible · 93 insufficient verified data · 0 excluded (Multan)

Max 10 Public Ranks

Rank	Project & Developer	Investment Score	Data Confidence	Legal Status	Development	Risk	Evidence Depth	Verified Yield	Last Verified	Action
#8	Shah Rukne Alam Phase-I Multan	88.7 /100	78 High	Verified Approved		Low risk	85%	—	7 Nov 2026	View Project

Ranks are Multan-specific. In compliance with publication standards, public category leaderboards display up to 10 top qualifying developments. Projects scored below the top 10 remain ranked on their individual profiles.

Project Directory: Assessed, Awaiting Verified Evidence

These developments are undergoing research and do not meet the ≥ 60% evidence threshold for public ranking. Unranked status indicates insufficient documented evidence, not an unfavorable score.